![]() It is difficult to differentiate from Chinese companies with 'QLED' TVs with quantum dot (QD) film added to liquid crystal display (LCD) panels. Samsung Electronics is in a situation where it has to reestablish its premium TV strategy due to setbacks in the QNED project, which it expected to mass-produce around 2024-2025. However, as the prediction that the installation of the QNED pilot line will be difficult within this year is prevailing, QNED mass production is expected to be expected only in 2025-2026, which is more than a year later than the original forecast.Ĭhanges in Samsung Electronics' premium TV strategy became inevitable. The industry has estimated the QNED mass production to be around 2024-2025 at the earliest. It is expected that Samsung Display will re-develop the QNED core technology at the laboratory level right now.ĭue to the postponement of the pilot line installation, the QNED mass production is expected to be delayed by more than a year. It is reported that the organization that was formed to install the QNED pilot line was disbanded and the related personnel returned to the existing division. Samsung Display was originally scheduled to install a QNED pilot line in Asan, South Chungcheong Province, in the fourth quarter of last year or the first quarter of this year, but this plan is known to have been delayed. QNED's nanorod LEDs are smaller than the LEDs used in Micro LED TV, which is currently Samsung Electronics' top premium TV lineup. QNED is a technology that uses a rod-shaped nanorod light emitting diode (LED) as a light source. Samsung Electronics' TV business strategy, which was planning to apply QNED to premium TVs following micro LED, has become inevitable.Īccording to the industry on the 12th, it was understood that the installation of the 'Quantum Dot Nanorod Light Emitting Diode (QNED) pilot line, a next-generation large display under development by Samsung Display, has been delayed. As the pilot line installation is delayed, the commercialization of QNED is expected to be delayed. The installation of the QNED pilot line, the next-generation large display of Samsung Display, has been delayed. Samsung Display postpones QNED pilot line installation Just happened to catch a peek for the first time in a while and now there is "burn in" issues - when will this train wreck stop? Like I suggested about a month ago and got heckled for on the S95B thread, the S95B will likely be the set with the greatest returns (from AVS members - not the uncritical "just shine bright saturated colors into my eyes" crowd ), It is a shame with all the great resources we have on AVScience, that anyone would even consider the opinions of nit wits. I feel bad for the owner's that fell for the FOMO, WhisperStatus, K(iller) G(reen)? ( from his voice and confused thinking he must be baked out of his mind all of the time) hyped to no end train from non critical "reviewers" that openly state they do not care about accuracy - they want to see colors far more intense than they really are (like they took magic mushrooms or smoked too much killer green) - "we don't care, we just want it to look good to our uncritical eyes". Need that extra vertical space.Ĭurrently sporting a 55" GX as a PC monitor BTW (as well as a 42" C2 since a few weeks).Ĭlick to expand.After the all the fiasco being reported on the S95B owner thread, won't give it a second consideration this year ( jury still out on the Sony A95K). The AW monitor is to low resolution for my needs which would probably be the obvious choice otherwise. (with TPC and GSR disabled, but that is probably a discussion better suited for other threads).Īnd yes, I am well aware that neither is close to optimal for typical "PC monitor work related" stuff, both because of it's size and because neither of them does really well with text rendering. Anyone that had a chance to compare it to a 55" LG OLED for the same usage and can comment on if it is more or less the same experience regarding text rendering etc? What has me going for the S95B would be slightly higher brightness, less aggressive ABL etc. As I understand it, the S95B does have a slightly different pixel structure compared to the Alienware screen, but it seems to be more or less the same in this regard. ![]() So, after the S95B has been out in the wild for a while, has thoughts on it's potential usability as a PC monitor not only for entertainment changed? Especially thinking of that fringing problem and it's effect on rendering of text in Windows and any potential fixes for it that might have been discovered since its release.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |